Tag: Multiemployer plan

MEDIA ADVISORY: Retired truck drivers, spouses and widows to rally at U.S. Capitol to protest proposed pension cuts
WASHINGTON – Tomorrow, on Thursday, April 14th from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., thousands of retired truck drivers, spouses and widows will travel to Washington, D.C., for a rally on the West Lawn of the U.S. Capitol to urge policymakers and the Treasury Department to stop unprecedented cuts to their hard-earned pensions. These retirees are […]

Losses under Goldman, Northern Trust accelerated Teamsters cuts
One of America’s most battle-hardened pension funds was flying high last decade with large bets on stocks, lower-rated bonds and real estate. But even during the best of times, the Central States Pension Fund needed to draw down at least $1.2 billion a year in capital to pay for overhead and Teamsters union drivers’ benefits.

MEDIA ADVISORY: Retirees coordinate statewide “March Madness” actions to protest unfair pension cuts
In a series of coordinated actions taking place from March 10-13, angry retired truck drivers, spouses and widows are taking to the streets in five states to protest unprecedented proposed cuts to their pensions. The retirees are calling on presidential candidates and members of Congress to protect their pensions and to educate other retirees that […]

Why the coming cuts to Teamster pensions deserve more national news coverage
Historically, it was illegal for pension plans to cut core benefits to people who are already retired; if the plan had money in the bank, it had to pay promised benefits. But many so-called “multi-employer” plans, which serve workers from multiple companies in a particular industry, have been falling into financial distress for years.

Houston workers fight for promised pensions
“We’ve never seen anything like this – ever,” Pension Rights Center Policy Director Karen Friedman said. “(The) law pretty much gives almost unbridled power to the trustees of certain pension funds that will allow them to cut the pensions of retirees by, in this case, as much as more than 70 percent.”